3 ms·
What I’m suggesting more than asking is, when you say that open source has lifted their development burden, it makes it sound like it’s a unidirectional taking.
by dagmx 2y ago
What I’m suggesting more than asking is, when you say that open source has lifted their development burden, it makes it sound like it’s a unidirectional taking.
And sure, some might be freeloading. But they also do contribute quite a bit to open source. https://opensource.apple.com/ https://opensource.apple.com/
I know your response was more to correct the “developed from scratch” but I still think it’s important to note that it’s not unidirectional. Even in the development of their own platforms, you can find old Usenet discussions of how they were feeding things back. I think they could have gone their own route but Unix compatibility was important.
The history of Next, Apple, and the open source community is very intertwined and unfortunately cannot be reduced so easily.
- justinclift 2y ago> ... it’s important to note that it’s not unidirectional. A somewhat unexpected factoid about Apple and OSS, is that Apple doesn't seem to provide hardware to any OSS projects they didn't themselves create. Not even Homebrew, who (to my thinking) should have been first in line due to the immense benefit they used to provide Apple's users.