4 ms·
that's not quite right. the court case was about whether the Company had sufficiently informed shareholders of the fact that the board was full of cronies. th
by bananapub 2y ago
that's not quite right.
the court case was about whether the Company had sufficiently informed shareholders of the fact that the board was full of cronies.
the re-vote information included details of the court case they'd just lost on the topic, presumably making the shareholders sufficiently informed about how corrupt the board was. in addition, to avoid the hippies of the Delaware Chancery court ever doing anything he didn't want in future, Musk also re-domiciled the company to Texas.