3 ms·
>perhaps supporting only 5G instead of all the legacy protocols as a sort of "brave" stance. Is this even feasible? I thought 5G wasn't really usable outside
by shiroiushi 2y ago
>perhaps supporting only 5G instead of all the legacy protocols as a sort of "brave" stance.
Is this even feasible? I thought 5G wasn't really usable outside urban environments because it has a lower range than 4G.
- iggldiggl 2y agoIs that an inherent property of 5G? Or just a side-effect of it being predominantly deployed in high-bandwidth high-frequency settings with the consequent low range resulting from the high frequency?
- londons_explore 2y agoThe main benefits of 5g lie in dense urban deployments, but it can totally be deployed in huge rural cells too.