> these are the exact same arguments people make against something like UBI or really any public benefits. "starving people feel motivated to eat food, so they

> these are the exact same arguments people make against something like UBI or really any public benefits. "starving people feel motivated to eat food, so they work to make money to buy food. therefore starving people is the correct thing to do because I believe that if we give people food they will be lazy" Hyperbole much? The mainstream arguments against UBI are nothing like this, because we already have systems in place to give starving people food.