> anyone with half a brain can see the problem with that ruling. If the definition of the word “reasonable” was left in the other half then sure. It’s the jo

> anyone with half a brain can see the problem with that ruling. If the definition of the word “reasonable” was left in the other half then sure. It’s the job that of the court to define what is “reasonable” on a case by case basis and establish a precedent. They can’t start coming up with laws themselves that clearly establish universal and specific limits.