3 ms·
There are times that parts of a law should be vague to allow those evolved to make intelligent decisions. They should be specific enough to come to a resolution
by tocs3 2y ago
There are times that parts of a law should be vague to allow those evolved to make intelligent decisions. They should be specific enough to come to a resolution quickly if needed.
- OutOfHere 2y agoThis opens the door to routine injustices whereby those who can afford expensive attorneys get a sweet deal, and everyone else gets stabbed in the name of justice.
- SoftTalker 2y agoCourts tend to follow precident, indeed precident is nearly the same as law. It's not really the case that an expensive attorney can argue his way around the well-established interpretations of the meaning of the constitution and other laws. Maybe, in the case of something novel, or for a question that has never come up before. It's not at all routine.
- autoexec 2y agothat sounds like what we have right now.