4 ms·
>They initially told him the design was good as is and required no feedback and change, but once the project was about to be deployed they suddenly became very
by bloggie 2y ago
>They initially told him the design was good as is and required no feedback and change, but once the project was about to be deployed they suddenly became very opinionated and critical of each and every tiny detail, including on the need to rewrite the component.
I think this is fine? It sucks, but sometimes priorities change, and due to the additional attention paid to that feature, it may have turned out to be not as important as originally thought. Staying critical throughout the development process is important, to ensure the implementation is as good as the design. And, keeping a broad view can help alleviate tunnel-vision syndrome, although it can suck for everyone involved.
- kccqzy 2y agoThat's not fine. That's an easy way to demotivate anyone. It's also a way to waste resources and make everyone busy while delivering nothing of value.
- FireBeyond 2y ago> it may have turned out to be not as important as originally thought. all those things could have happened, but I doubt they were just 'discovered' at launch, and are so critical and diametrically opposed that there was no ability to communicate that at some point beforehand.