3 ms·
As described, I can't say who's at fault. What is outrageous about having few complaints about a high level design, but many more concrete complaints when ther
by jayd16 2y ago
As described, I can't say who's at fault. What is outrageous about having few complaints about a high level design, but many more concrete complaints when there is a concrete implementation?
If someone can derail the project they should have been giving feed back iteratively, otherwise we fall into a water fall trap.
I don't really like the "senior design review" because of this lack of continued involvement.
- michaelcampbell 2y ago> What is outrageous about having few complaints about a high level design, but many more concrete complaints when there is a concrete implementation? This is pure https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_triviality https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_triviality
- jayd16 2y agoSometimes its bike shedding, sure. Sometimes the actual implementation has flaws that weren't revealed in the early design. There's a reason we don't use waterfall and calling it an "early design review" doesn't make that better.