From my perspective it is neither wrong nor right. Articles are supposed to be written for a target audience, and I think the only issue is that the original ar

From my perspective it is neither wrong nor right. Articles are supposed to be written for a target audience, and I think the only issue is that the original article didn't mention the target audience is people who don't want to aim for the moon, but would be satisfied with just having a stable life where they're in control of their own decisions; in the vein of an indie hacker, a family business or other sustainable ways of doing small to medium business. This is hackernews, and we, as an audience live in a little bubble where the only right way to do business is by disrupting a market and becoming the next Google, Microsoft or Apple. Just like some of the contemporaries that originated from this subculture here like; Stripe, Reddit and openAI. There are many ways of doing business. The original article had a sound strategy for one particular way of business. This article by common cog has another sound strategy for doing business. Different target audiences, different games.