3 ms·

But it was possible to circumvent it without any problem, which it won’t be in the future. That’s literally what the Article is about. So what changed?

• Rinzler89 2y ago
  The better question would be why they allowed the bypass in the first place since MS made the TPM and CPU requirements quite clear from day one, and why people are surprised the requirements are being enforced.
  • echoangle 2y ago
    Well as far as I know there was no loss of functionality from the bypass, so either the requirement is completely arbitrary to deprecate old devices or there will be new features in the future that depend on the TPM.
    • Rinzler89 2y ago
      >Well as far as I know there was no loss of functionality from the bypass The loss was on security and potential stability, not on functionality.
      • echoangle 2y ago
        So they are starting to require the additional security now? That was my initial question.