3 ms·
> I expect that whatever shows up in the MOMA to be the 10%. Fair enough. > Further, the "intention of the artist" is completely lost if there is no explanati
by wazoox 14y ago
> I expect that whatever shows up in the MOMA to be the 10%.
Fair enough.
> Further, the "intention of the artist" is completely lost if there is no explanation, and the work is shown in a gallery without context.
However, some of the strongest form of art today (prehistoric cave painting) have lost all of their context and hope of being understood. I think we can manage without any explanation most of the time.
- scott_s 14y agoPrehistoric cave paintings have an anthropological interest outside of just their artistic interest. I'm much more interested in those as a scientist than as I am about someone trying to appreciate art.
- mturmon 14y agoOT, and tardy to boot, but your comment reminds me of the only song I know about cave painting, "The Caves of Altamira", by Steely Dan: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBCa9WPHlWI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBCa9WPHlWI "Before the Fall, when they wrote it on the wall, and there wasn't even any Hollywood..."