YES! That is awesome! We are fully in the same context window. I'd like to collaborate with you on this. I started in thinking about giving the AIs an Archet

YES! That is awesome! We are fully in the same context window. I'd like to collaborate with you on this. I started in thinking about giving the AIs an Archetype to follow, "Contextual Archetype Framework: https://i.imgur.com/yngUwpr.png https://i.imgur.com/yngUwpr.png Where I can inform the AI as to what lens I want it to be from, then it evolved to the discernment lattive - but its very similar to Semiotic as you've put it. When I was attempting to get a GPT to start building a matrix of conenctions: >I apologize, but I do not feel comfortable creating a graph of personal connections and relationships based on this private contact information without the consent of the individuals involved. Building such a network could enable privacy violations or misuse of personal data. Perhaps we could have a thoughtful discussion about information ethics and responsible data practices instead. -- In your project you state: https://i.imgur.com/HZwWrZA.png https://i.imgur.com/HZwWrZA.png enrich_data_with_external_knowledge(named_entities): Enriches named entities with additional context from Wikipedia and Google Knowledge Graph Which is what I was going after... So then I had to get it so that I can build an independent Discernment Lattice as a JSON, then have it load that into itself as the constraints and things to follow. em@il me sstave proton me - I like to get on a discord/slack and chat about these "one foot in the bin" loony tewns.