> If it is, does that mean that they are legally obligated to try and steal Apples employees? No, it means they're legally obligated not to conditionally agree

> If it is, does that mean that they are legally obligated to try and steal Apples employees? No, it means they're legally obligated not to conditionally agree with Apple that neither of them will steal each other's employees. > What does that even look like from a practical point of view? How is that enforced? Motive is a prominent part of legal . It's not easy to prove obviously, but it's not anything particularly unique to this type of case.