2 ms·
The problem is people at large companies creating these AI models, wanting the freedom to copy artists’ works when using it, but these large companies also want
by teddyh 2y ago
The problem is people at large companies creating these AI models, wanting the freedom to copy artists’ works when using it, but these large companies also want to keep copyright protection intact, for their regular business activities. They want to eat the cake and have it too. And they are arguing for essentially eliminating copyright for their specific purpose and convenience, when copyright has virtually never been loosened for the public’s convenience, even when the exceptions the public asks for are often minor and laudable. If these companies were to argue that copyright should be eliminated because of this new technology, I might not object. But now that they come and ask… no, they pretend to already have, a copyright exception for their specific use, I will happily turn around and use their own copyright maximalist arguments against them.
(Copied from a comment of mine written more than two years ago: <https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33582047 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33582047>)
- tgma 2y agoI agree with your characterization. It's probable that they will have to weaken their existing positions and pivot to the new world of copyright. Nevertheless that is a good argument. That argument wouldn't start with a dig against Google Books or Google Search which is a net positive for the consumer and the society and I believe the original author in most cases. The publisher is the annoyed party.