3 ms·
It’s the opposite really. We will skip OpenAI and go to media companies that are proficient in using available ai tools.
by jncfhnb 2y ago
It’s the opposite really. We will skip OpenAI and go to media companies that are proficient in using available ai tools.
- fuzzfactor 2y agoIt may not make a difference if all published material converges :\
- toomuchtodo 2y agoWhy would media companies be better than technologists training against all publicly available content (torrents, streaming, offline media)? Media companies are good at capturing value via copyright and creating a moat through resources needed to produce content, not technology.
- jncfhnb 2y agoWe are nowhere close to removing the need for creative vision and good execution for useful or popular works. Even with AI creating art is still labor intensive. We are close to having open source tech that is on par with closed source tech (flux vs OpenAI Sora). I’m not referring the patent holding media giants. I’m referring creative studios.
- toomuchtodo 2y agoI agree with that.
- szastamasta 2y agoI’m not sure about that. I think the OpenAI deals the cards here. They have the model and the data. If these media outlets fire creative people there’s nothing they have that OpenAI hasn’t got.
- robwwilliams 2y agoI have being using Claude 3.5 as a reading companion with which/whom I can have a surprisingly intelligent conversation on topics that are new to me or well known. It adds an interactive conversation to reading. Who is going to indulge me in a conversation at 11 PM on some abstruse text I happen to be reading? Claude! Yes, frequent errors but if I give a quote or screen shot then smart rebuttals or extensions. This makes my thinking sharper and learning much more fun.