4 ms·
There are some big issues with the ML community today. One is brazen assumptions. If the subject is under study, why write your title and abstract in such a fas
by slashdave 2y ago
There are some big issues with the ML community today. One is brazen assumptions. If the subject is under study, why write your title and abstract in such a fashion that you assume that LLMs can "understand". That is the source of my original (fairly mild) objection. If the problem isn't "solved", why assume it is?
- stevenhuang 2y ago> Can Large Language Models Understand Symbolic Graphics Programs? The title is framed as a question. And even throughout the study, the authors are careful to refer to this apparent reasoning ability with the appropriate qualifiers. > To understand symbolic programs, LLMs may need to possess the ability to imagine how the corresponding graphics content would look without directly accessing the rendered visual content > We find that this task distinguishes existing LLMs and models considered good at reasoning perform better In short no such assumption is made. You are so overwhelmed by your personal biases you're not even comprehending what you're reading.
- slashdave 2y agoYou make an excellent point.