4 ms·
If you look at the aggregate of The Economist's "reporting" on China, the GPs comment is correct. One could even argue they are a Chinese asset because they mi
by pphysch 2y ago
If you look at the aggregate of The Economist's "reporting" on China, the GPs comment is correct.
One could even argue they are a Chinese asset because they mislead Western investors so fantastically and consistently on basic economic topics, a sort of Great Filter.
- gruez 2y ago>they mislead Western investors so fantastically and consistently on basic economic topics ???
- jncfhnb 2y ago[flagged]
- 1mcag 2y agoAny newspaper contains significantly more conjecture and guessing that the comment you reply to. It is ironic that the Economist was the magazine from which I learned speculating about behind the scenes actions and personal power politics. Yet you do not call the Economist reporters conspiracy theorists. The Economist is consistently wrong about ... economic predictions, which is what GP was making fun of.