> I never understand why people don't just test this? I never understand why people take things out of context instead of responding to the totality of a messa

> I never understand why people don't just test this? I never understand why people take things out of context instead of responding to the totality of a message, since I started off by saying: > To my understanding, You have responded not by providing your understanding but by belittling me. Nonetheless, I appreciate you taking the time to query Claude-3.5 and sharing the results. According to Amazon Bedrock adds Claude 3.5-sonnect[0] is a multimodal model with state-of-the-art vision processing, which tells me that Claude can "cheat" by rendering the SVG and then passing to the image model for the results which is perhaps one way of describing "imagining" things, but it does not describe a strict Large Language Model which predicts the next token. > The multimodal Claude 3.5 Sonnet also excels at processing images with state-of-the-art vision, particularly when interpreting charts and graphs—helping to get faster, deeper insights from data. It can accurately decipher text from imperfect images—for example, poorly scanned documents—and in doing so, glean more insights than from text alone. [0] https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/aws/amazon-bedrock-anthropic-ai-claude-3-5-sonnet https://www.aboutamazon.com/news/aws/amazon-bedrock-anthropi...