I've met so many X under X in my life, working in big banking and big consultancies ("the big 4") and they range between useless/yes-men/yes-women/Peter Princip

I've met so many X under X in my life, working in big banking and big consultancies ("the big 4") and they range between useless/yes-men/yes-women/Peter Principle achievers at 29/butt-kissers/diversity-hires/sociopaths/psychopaths and many other despicable (non-meritocratic) attributes. So anytime I see on a magazine articles like that, I safely ignore the whole thing (and ofc I never click X u X articles - I got better things to waste my time on)(I just wanted to leave this comment here to save other people the time of focusing on X u X lists and people)(exceptions are always there, but a safe bet is that if you shake the hands of 28 out of 30, you better wash your hands afterwards.