6 ms·
I expect that whatever shows up in the MOMA to be the 10%. Further, the "intention of the artist" is completely lost if there is no explanation, and the work is
by scott_s 14y ago
I expect that whatever shows up in the MOMA to be the 10%. Further, the "intention of the artist" is completely lost if there is no explanation, and the work is shown in a gallery without context. Something has to give.
- wazoox 14y ago> I expect that whatever shows up in the MOMA to be the 10%. Fair enough. > Further, the "intention of the artist" is completely lost if there is no explanation, and the work is shown in a gallery without context. However, some of the strongest form of art today (prehistoric cave painting) have lost all of their context and hope of being understood. I think we can manage without any explanation most of the time.
- scott_s 14y agoPrehistoric cave paintings have an anthropological interest outside of just their artistic interest. I'm much more interested in those as a scientist than as I am about someone trying to appreciate art.
- mturmon 14y agoOT, and tardy to boot, but your comment reminds me of the only song I know about cave painting, "The Caves of Altamira", by Steely Dan: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBCa9WPHlWI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mBCa9WPHlWI "Before the Fall, when they wrote it on the wall, and there wasn't even any Hollywood..."
- wpietri 14y agoThe stuff that shows up in the MOMA is surely the top 10% for some audience; otherwise a curator wouldn't have bothered with it. If you're expecting that it should also be in your top 10%, well, then you have created yourself an expectation. If eventually that stops being fun, there are other things you can do.