While of course this being a possibly valid legal argument is completely inane, I must assume Disney is doing this for precedent, not for this one case. They wa

While of course this being a possibly valid legal argument is completely inane, I must assume Disney is doing this for precedent, not for this one case. They want to be able to use this absurd line of reasoning in any future lawsuit and are afraid they will lose the ability to do so. I could be wrong, not a legal scholar.