3 ms·
Disney claims it is not their restaurant: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/disney-says-man-cant-sue-wifes-death-agreed-disney-terms-service-rcna166594 http
by lotsofpulp 2y ago
Disney claims it is not their restaurant:
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/disney-says-man-cant-sue-wifes-death-agreed-disney-terms-service-rcna166594 https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/disney-says-man-cant-su...
> A spokesperson for Disney told NBC News: “We are deeply saddened by the family’s loss and understand their grief. Given that this restaurant is neither owned nor operated by Disney, we are merely defending ourselves against the plaintiff’s attorney’s attempt to include us in their lawsuit against the restaurant.”
- JohnFen 2y agoWhat a load of nonsense. If Disney really isn't legally responsible for that restaurant, there is a common and established way of getting their name off the lawsuit. It's quite common when a lawsuit is filed that everyone even remotely connected gets named, then those who aren't involved petition the court to get their name dropped. I've been a part of several lawsuits in this way, and getting dropped has never been a problem.
- jimt1234 2y agoBS. If that was the case (Disney doesn't own or operate the restaurant), then that would've been Disney's first motion to the court. But it wasn't. Their initial argument was that the Disney+ EULA binds the dude to arbitration.