a) It is Google's requirement to abstain from abusing its market power. Apple has no requirement to abstain from agreements that may be abuse of Google's market

a) It is Google's requirement to abstain from abusing its market power. Apple has no requirement to abstain from agreements that may be abuse of Google's market power. b) The contract may have been acceptable when entered into. But it's a continual performance contract, so it cam be reviewed under the current conditions. c) There's no need to cover everything in a single case. If the Mozilla contract didn't come up in this case, if the final decision bars the Apple contract, Google legal will consider the Mozilla contract in light of the decision and probably act appropriately. If not, there will be precedent and a new case on the Mozilla contract will go quickly.