2 ms·
No, I don't mean copy the waiver. I mean get your company into the existing Disney waivers so that everyone who has already clicked for Disney+ now also cannot
by sandworm101 2y ago
No, I don't mean copy the waiver. I mean get your company into the existing Disney waivers so that everyone who has already clicked for Disney+ now also cannot sue your company.
Imagine that Disney buys a competitor park. That park is now under the Disney waiver. But maybe the competitor park is not purchased but instead pays a fee to become a "Disney partner" and therefore enjoy the protections of Disney's extensive waiver scheme even if they have no real relationship with Disney.
- kube-system 2y agoSounds like a stretch in what would pass the doctrine of reasonable expectations.
- panzagl 2y agoOr else every chemical manufacturer launches/acquires a streaming service- can't wait to watch new shows on Roundup+ or AsbestosMax
- techjamie 2y agoIn this post: Wild, humorous speculation I wouldn't recommend anyone to attempt. If courts can't decide whether an arbitration agreement applies unless it goes to an arbitrator, then could I just say that I'm affiliated with Disney and then they have to get an arbitrator to decide I'm not affiliated with Disney? Or, if I were to subscribe to Disney Plus, could I use that as a basis to claim that I am affiliated by being a subscriber and therefore it requires arbitration? That is assuming that the plaintiff is a Disney+ subscriber.
- sandworm101 2y agoI think he wasn't actually a subscriber. I think he had just clicked the waiver for a one-month free trial. The lack of payment will likely be part of the court's decision.