4 ms·
"Obviously" is doing a lot of work here. I liked the article and thought it was a fun peek deeper into the regulatory and safety manual side of things. You at
by collingreen 2y ago
"Obviously" is doing a lot of work here.
I liked the article and thought it was a fun peek deeper into the regulatory and safety manual side of things.
You attacking it for being really weird and then about how _obviously_ it is or isn't certain ways compared to historic fires in other tunnels feels forced and out of place to me.
- Veedrac 2y agoI said the fire safety comparisons were reasonable and don't think, nor did I state, that the article was actively bad there. My pushback here was to the HN comment claiming the risk was much worse than the historic comparisons, which the article didn't do. I agree the article was fun and had charm. My criticisms were more narrow than that.