4 ms·
Stratospheric Al2O3 aerosols from space exploration are a phenomenon studied since at least the 1980's. Space Shuttle pollution probably dwarfs all of these mod
by perihelions 2y ago
Stratospheric Al2O3 aerosols from space exploration are a phenomenon studied since at least the 1980's. Space Shuttle pollution probably dwarfs all of these modern sources, since aluminum was the primary fuel for the STS solid rocket boosters (about 160 tons Al per launch if I mathed right).
- "The most probable source of the increasingly abundant classes of stratospheric particles are aerospace activities. As these activities increase, so will the flux of anthropogenic material into the atmosphere[Kessler, 1985; Johnson,1985]. It is possible to predict the composition of these particles from a knowledge of the most commonly used spacecraft materials. There should be four main sources for solid particulate aerospace material in the stratosphere.These are (1) solid rocket fuel exhaust, (2) solid rocket motor (SRM) ablation, (3) thermal reflective paint from the outer hulls of spacecraft,and (4) ablating hardware from satellites and discarded rocket sections in low-Earth orbit."
- "It is well known that solid rocket fuel containing an aluminum additive produces spherical grains composed predominently of alumina when burned, and these particles have previously been noted among stratospheric particle collections [Brownlee et ai., 1976; Zolensky and Mackinnon, 1985]. The use of SRMs has increased steadily since the advent of the space shuttle, in 1981, to a peak in 1985."
https://sci-hub.se/10.1029/jd094id01p01047 https://sci-hub.se/10.1029/jd094id01p01047 ("A tenfold increase in the abundance of large solid particles in the stratosphere, as measured over the period 1976–1984" (1989))
I don't buy for one second the sudden urgency to halt critical US/NATO military space capabilities for a phenomenon that's been studied for 40+ years with no obvious major issues.
- falcolas 2y agoAm I missing something, or are we talking about two different things - commercial vs. military usage? Starlink is not a military asset. Well, not for the US at least. Ukrane and Russia, certainly.
- pnw 2y agoStarshield by SpaceX is most certainly a military asset.
- ElectronCharge 2y agoThere’s also an easy fix, switch the structure from aluminum to carbon fiber…
- dylan604 2y agoOnly if we can make the rockets look sexy by having that carbon fiber look instead of just boring painted metal look.
- ElectronCharge 2y agoStarship’s tiles give it a nice look, and it’s the next-gen Starlink launcher… :-)
- someguydave 2y agoWell you see rocket man bad, no means are unjust when it comes to his diminishment