They neglected to put in other numbers though because the other numbers don’t fit their narrative. For instance, the total tonnage of atmospheric air which dwa

They neglected to put in other numbers though because the other numbers don’t fit their narrative. For instance, the total tonnage of atmospheric air which dwarfs their scare numbers by any measure. 5.15 x 10^15 tons is a way bigger number. Which if you do the math means these deorbiting satellites will be adding 0.0000000771 ppm to the atmosphere. You probably get exposed to 10,000 times more than that heating a leftover burrito in foil in the toaster oven. They also conveniently chose to share the much higher urban rate for Starlink service when conceding that it is useful in rural areas, trying to make it seem less appealing with their if you can afford it verbiage. It’s clear what’s going on here. Agenda driven “journalism” that hates on technology with a crafted narrative.