2 ms·

> I'm not a CSM, but I work with hundreds of them Ooo, I'm in trouble now. Seriously, I hope the smart among them regard the little vendor merit badge with th

by olefoo 18y ago

> I'm not a CSM, but I work with hundreds of them Ooo, I'm in trouble now. Seriously, I hope the smart among them regard the little vendor merit badge with the right amount of sarcasm, because if you uncritically swallow a bunch of ritual packaged as a methodology and think that that somehow makes you safe from project failure... you're doomed. A Google query for "methane and carbon sequestration" nets 179K results; not proof positive, but at least as relevant as your wikiwhack. Also atmospheric methane breaks down into carbon dioxide and water in the presence of oxygen (at sufficient concentrations the reaction can take the form of a flame, or an explosion) so increased methane converts into increased carbon dioxide eventually. Now, if I had infinite amounts of time and patience I would attempt to set you right; but my life is too crowded to waste time on someone who seems to delight in inflammatory political statements on a tech/biz forum. //sad day when I have to set up plonk for HN :-(

DanielBMarkham 18y ago
Checking your google search, out of the first five pages _none_ are about methane sequestration. They all mention methane because, interestingly enough, methane is a by-product of CO2 sequestration. I'm just going to ignore all of your barbs. Not really relevant to the discussion. You're right. You shouldn't engage in threads you don't know anything about.
- olefoo 18y ago
  > methane sequestration We were talking about 'carbon sequestration' which, I've attempted several times to explain to you, also covers methane. You can bloviate obtusely all you want, but it will not change the fact that I have formed the opinion that you are either an idiot, which is bad; or a troll, which is worse. You pollute this site with an endless string of political cheap shots which; I'll be frank, even when I agree with you your tone and manner make me want to disagree with you. And if I were a customer of yours I would be wondering how many of the billable hours I was paying for went to feed your HN habit; you're on here an awful lot.

by olefoo 18y ago

DanielBMarkham 18y ago

Checking your google search, out of the first five pages _none_ are about methane sequestration. They all mention methane because, interestingly enough, methane is a by-product of CO2 sequestration. I'm just going to ignore all of your barbs. Not really relevant to the discussion. You're right. You shouldn't engage in threads you don't know anything about.

olefoo 18y ago
> methane sequestration We were talking about 'carbon sequestration' which, I've attempted several times to explain to you, also covers methane. You can bloviate obtusely all you want, but it will not change the fact that I have formed the opinion that you are either an idiot, which is bad; or a troll, which is worse. You pollute this site with an endless string of political cheap shots which; I'll be frank, even when I agree with you your tone and manner make me want to disagree with you. And if I were a customer of yours I would be wondering how many of the billable hours I was paying for went to feed your HN habit; you're on here an awful lot.