3 ms·
They do not consistently underperform. Just go to wikipedia: > According to Virginie Pérotin's research which looked at two decades worth of international data
by FranzFerdiNaN 2y ago
They do not consistently underperform. Just go to wikipedia:
> According to Virginie Pérotin's research which looked at two decades worth of international data, worker cooperatives are more productive than conventional businesses. Another 1987 study of worker cooperatives in Italy, the UK, and France found "positive" relationships with productivity. It also found that worker cooperatives do not become less productive as they get larger. A 1995 study of worker cooperatives in the timber industry in Washington, USA found that "co-ops are more efficient than the principal conventional firms by between 6 and 14 percent".
- janalsncm 2y agoI wonder why there aren’t more worker co-ops then. Maybe they’re more productive per worker but struggle to grow big enough? Or maybe they’re less likely to survive a downturn because layoffs are harder?
- truckerbill 2y agoDon’t discount that they’re also seen as a threat to the status quo
- Jensson 2y agoNo they are not, there are so few co-ops that nobody cares about them. No politician campaigns promising to destroy co-ops, not even Trump, because there is no reason to.
- lupusreal 2y agoI doubt the demographics of coop participation are even partisan. Urban organic food coops probably skew left, but all those rural infrastructure coops, fuel/etc service for farmers, probably skew right. Attacking coops wouldn't win you votes with many people on either side.
- throwaway7ahgb 2y agoThey aren't a threat , which force is stopping coops from starting exactly?
- gen220 2y agoBecause it takes capital to start a business. People with capital like to retain control over their capital, so they don’t start cooperatives. Coops don’t have the same incentive structure as external-investor-beholden corporations, so they don’t pursue “growth at all costs”, but rather survival at all costs (job preservation), and then growth where appropriate (pie expansion). It’s kind of like the trade off between authoritarian regimes and democratic regimes. One is fast but flimsy, the other is slow but robust.
- eptcyka 2y agoBanks dont want to lend money to them as often/much/favorably, coops usually don’t want investment. To start a business you need capital, if you have enough on your own, you do not need a coop, much more difficult to convince a group of people to risk together unless they’ve all had previous experience with one another.
- s1artibartfast 2y agoWhy would Banks shy away if they are more productive and have better margins?
- eptcyka 2y agoBanks calculate risk by looking at data, and there is far less of it for coops. And they are often irrational actors.