I mean, anything can be done poorly. But consider that the team that builds the vehicles you drive is not the same as the team that tested said vehicle for saf

I mean, anything can be done poorly. But consider that the team that builds the vehicles you drive is not the same as the team that tested said vehicle for safety concerns. That is, you can have a solid testing team for pretty much anything. You have to empower them, though. Largely, a lot of what you get to empower them with is ability to put constraints onto the engineering team. This could be crappy constraints that are far sweeping on the product. There is no need that it has to be that, though. The only constraint you have to have is stability of product interface. Which.... yeah, our industry doesn't do that so well. (Note, not stability as in "doesn't crash." Stability as in, same inputs that worked last year work today.)