It’s not so much that I didn’t understand the principles behind continuity. It’s just that the way my teachers presented the material lacked historical context

It’s not so much that I didn’t understand the principles behind continuity. It’s just that the way my teachers presented the material lacked historical context. After a BSc in pure math I discovered that I enjoyed applied math and CS much more, which told me that I need concrete examples to understand a theory: if you tell me about abstractions like groups and rings, which took years to establish, I lose interest. Tell me that groups express properties of matrix multiplications, or permutations, or modular arithmetic, and I’ll get it right away. It’s the way my mind works, but I’m sure I’m not alone, and mathematical pedagogy would benefit from historical context.