3 ms·
If "news" was highly regulated then likely nobody would produce it. Everything would simply become "opinion" or discussion of topics. Honestly you already see t
by listenallyall 2y ago
If "news" was highly regulated then likely nobody would produce it. Everything would simply become "opinion" or discussion of topics. Honestly you already see that at all the host-personality shows on CNN/Fox/MSNBC, every hour starts with a monologue then 50 minutes of panel discussions.
- autoexec 2y ago> If "news" was highly regulated then likely nobody would produce it. Everything would simply become "opinion" or discussion of topics. That doesn't really seem much different from what we have now though. It seems like there's more commentary than content.
- listenallyall 2y agoYes, because it's cheaper and easier and has a longer tail (the press conference may be 20 minutes, the discussion about it can last all day) and is likely more entertaining (because the host can inject some personality) - so if you added more regulation to the "news" side, it would tip the balance to "opinion"/entertainment even further.