3 ms·
No -- but I will leave it to the RFD that I'm currently writing (and to the others that we will make public) to explain the rationale.
by bcantrill 2y ago
No -- but I will leave it to the RFD that I'm currently writing (and to the others that we will make public) to explain the rationale.
- redwood 2y agoLook forward to reading it
- bcantrill 2y agoAs promised, I have made RFD 508 ("Whither CockroachDB?")[0] public -- along with RFD 53[1] and RFD 110[2], which explain the problem we are trying to solve and our rationale for CockroachDB, respectively. [0] https://rfd.shared.oxide.computer/rfd/0508 https://rfd.shared.oxide.computer/rfd/0508 [1] https://rfd.shared.oxide.computer/rfd/0053 https://rfd.shared.oxide.computer/rfd/0053 [2] https://rfd.shared.oxide.computer/rfd/0110 https://rfd.shared.oxide.computer/rfd/0110
- redwood 2y agoThanks: I think there's a category you're missing, which is transactional document oriented databases with strongly consistent secondary indexes.
- moderation 2y agoNot Jepsen tested but rqlite [0] could be in the running and meet the requirements and is open source (MIT). 0. https://rqlite.io/ https://rqlite.io/
- Rawennum 2y agoHi, Does multi-region replication also go under the apache license?