> You're conflating a few things here. It's likely: I purposefully stayed loose about the "infinite processes" to avoid going awry. I do however remembered him

> You're conflating a few things here. It's likely: I purposefully stayed loose about the "infinite processes" to avoid going awry. I do however remembered him justifying his views as such though: he's not going into details, but he's making that point here[0] (c. 0:40). I assumed — perhaps wrongfully — that he got those historical "facts" correct. https://youtu.be/I0JozyxM1M0?si=IFdWcEWNeNKDid7t&t=39 https://youtu.be/I0JozyxM1M0?si=IFdWcEWNeNKDid7t&t=39