2 ms·
Of course they are derivative. The question is whether they are transformative. Right or wrong, the bar for transformative use is probably lower than you thin
by paulddraper 2y ago
Of course they are derivative.
The question is whether they are transformative.
Right or wrong, the bar for transformative use is probably lower than you think.
Artists are the beneficiaries of this, as they can riff on popular works for inspiration, recognizability, social commentary.
Given the existing case law, I don't see a ruling against AI companies as likely.
- doctorpangloss 2y ago> Given the existing case law, I don't see a ruling against AI companies as likely. Huh? Every corporate IP lawyer seems to think Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith has foreclosed the fair use defense, and that there isn't much to argue by AI companies to use work without express permission for training.
- paulddraper 2y agoThe use of the artwork was a TIME magazine cover, which has the same commercial purpose as the original photo owned by Goldsmith. It's far from clear that case would apply here.