No, remedies are meant to be tailored to the specific wrongs found in a specific case. There are precedents for things like, “that amount of money is too much,”

No, remedies are meant to be tailored to the specific wrongs found in a specific case. There are precedents for things like, “that amount of money is too much,” or “this equitable remedy requires these kinds of findings,” but there’s no 1:1 way to cite the remedies here for anything Apple-related, at least not as binding precedent (which is what it means that our law is based on precedent). That said, another judge might look at it as persuasive material that they accept the reasoning of and apply it elsewhere. It’ll be easier to get another judge to order a similar remedy if it has already been ordered in another case and has survived the gauntlet of appeals.