> I said 'if there's a market for it'. In which case, that reminds me: The neat thing about central planning is that it can invest in things-- like rural elec

> I said 'if there's a market for it'. In which case, that reminds me: The neat thing about central planning is that it can invest in things-- like rural electrification-- which are cost prohibitive for a market-based solution, if/when that need arises. So would you agree they are both neat in their own way?