> You seem to be spinning heavily the contributions of those people, as well as the intentions of the company. The intentions of the company are to benefit the

> You seem to be spinning heavily the contributions of those people, as well as the intentions of the company. The intentions of the company are to benefit the shareholders. Employees are paid for their time and expertise - nothing more. That's the end of the relationship unless said employees also hold an ownership stake, in which-case they'd get a vote/say in how the company governs itself and strategizes for future unknown climates.