3 ms·
You seem to be spinning heavily the contributions of those people, as well as the intentions of the company. Also, the assumption that the affected departments
by neilv 2y ago
You seem to be spinning heavily the contributions of those people, as well as the intentions of the company.
Also, the assumption that the affected departments should've known this was coming doesn't match up with a lot of what we've heard from many other of the "cut x%" layoffs the last few years.
Regarding "entitled" to a job, you're responding to a comment that suggests considering it as an economic problem: many people don't want to be laid off, so hopefully those people (part of the market) can apply negative feedback to that undesired behavior.
- s1artibartfast 2y agoWho said they should have known it was coming? Sometimes circumstances change and thats OK. Why would we want to apply negative feedback? I dont want any company to employ workers they dont want. Heck, sometimes I wish my employer would do layoffs to get rid of some of the dead weight.
- Alupis 2y ago> You seem to be spinning heavily the contributions of those people, as well as the intentions of the company. The intentions of the company are to benefit the shareholders. Employees are paid for their time and expertise - nothing more. That's the end of the relationship unless said employees also hold an ownership stake, in which-case they'd get a vote/say in how the company governs itself and strategizes for future unknown climates.