4 ms·
But in the limit, where most output could be automated, then there would be no society worth having. Without some fundamental redistribution of how wealth is
by MattPalmer1086 2y ago
But in the limit, where most output could be automated, then there would be no society worth having.
Without some fundamental redistribution of how wealth is allocated, anyway.
- Nifty3929 2y agoReally? - that sounds like utopia to me. We don't have to work at things that we don't want to. We can go rock climbing or play music or whatever. And the machines to all the work. We could still make a table or write a program if we want to - for it's own sake. Yes, of course we have to handle the distribution of the stuff, but that's really a separate problem.
- MattPalmer1086 2y agoCould go either way; extreme dystopia, or utopia. The issue is how all that wonderful productivity is distributed.