3 ms·
> All file sharing platforms had this exact problem. This was the problem back then. You could even find full length movies on YouTube quite easily. They were e
by tzs 2y ago
> All file sharing platforms had this exact problem. This was the problem back then. You could even find full length movies on YouTube quite easily. They were eventually removed, but it was a long, manual and tedious process. Even today, this is still not completely solved.
At Megaupload they were not eventually removed. At Megaupload the same physical file could be accessed by different URLs. When a rights holder reported the content Megaupload only made it so the specific URL no longer worked.
> If we are fair, Kim was not the one uploading the restricted content to Megaupload, neither encouraging it.
He was encouraging it. Top management of Megaupload had discussions specifically about encouraging more piracy and making it harder for rights holders to get infringing material removed.
They published list of the top downloads, but first checked them for pirated content and removed those items from the list. What purposed does that have other than trying to hide the infringement?
- moralestapia 2y ago>At Megaupload they were not eventually removed. This is not true. All DMCIA requests were properly addressed and the content removed. They even had a dedicated page to submit these requests, years before YouTube and others did so. >Top management of Megaupload had discussions specifically about encouraging more piracy and making it harder for rights holders to get infringing material removed. I would like to see a source for this.
- tzs 2y agoThe source is internal emails and chat logs from Megaupload that were released as part of the case against them.