3 ms·
>> tried where the offences actually took place The general rule is that a crime takes place where the victim stands. Where the perpetrator stand is a potentia
by sandworm101 2y ago
>> tried where the offences actually took place
The general rule is that a crime takes place where the victim stands. Where the perpetrator stand is a potential secondary location. The alleged victims here were "standing" in the US and so the US is proceeding with the case.
Trials in a third location are extraordinarily rare. Only things like the ICC or some admiralty proceedings involve trials in a third location.
- fluoridation 2y agoSo if someone robs your house while you're out of the country, the crime would have taken place in whatever country you happened to be in at that time, right? That's how that would play out. Because if that's not the case it would imply that the house itself would be the victim. I also think it's odd to talk about this being the "general rule" when there's plenty of crimes/infractions with no victim.