I don't understand how this is, at all, hyperbolic. It's very clear and obvious, regardless of your political affiliation, that this court: 1. is extremely co

I don't understand how this is, at all, hyperbolic. It's very clear and obvious, regardless of your political affiliation, that this court: 1. is extremely conservative 2. plays fast and loose with precedent 3. has an originalist stance to the constitution, at least when convenient to conservative political stances There're multiple landmark cases demonstrating this. To me, this isn't even a political opinion - it's just the clear and evident truth of how this court operates.