I remember thinking as like a 10 year old that it was weird that presidents are immune from prosecution. So it’s definitely not a new thing. Is there something

I remember thinking as like a 10 year old that it was weird that presidents are immune from prosecution. So it’s definitely not a new thing. Is there something very nuanced about the Supreme Court ruling that I am missing? As with many political issues, online discussion about the topic is mostly screeching, and it’s hard to tell what’s really going on.