3 ms·
This is a sort of lazy Ask HN: but in your experience, what is more useful / valuable - nanosecond representation, or years outside the nano range of something
by lifeisstillgood 2y ago
This is a sort of lazy Ask HN: but in your experience, what is more useful / valuable - nanosecond representation, or years outside the nano range of something like 1678-2200
I don't do "proper" science so the value of nanoseconds seems limited to very clever experiments (or some financial trade tracking that is probalby even more limited in scope).
But being able to represent historical dates seems more likely to come up?
Thoughts?
- cyberax 2y agoHistorical dates, for sure. Simply reducing the precision to 10ns will provide enough range in practice.
- rokkamokka 2y agoA bit like asking if a hammer or a screwdriver is more useful. It depends on the work
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]