3 ms·
The LVCC so far is more expensive, slower to build, has had more disruptions, needs huge stations, is only one-way, and has terrible privacy (you're stuck with
by tsimionescu 2y ago
The LVCC so far is more expensive, slower to build, has had more disruptions, needs huge stations, is only one-way, and has terrible privacy (you're stuck with a stranger in the small space of a car instead of a the large space of a subway car).
It's worse than a subway in every possible way. And it will always be worse than a subway in every possible way, because cars are an extremely inefficient way of carrying people around. You can make a train with more private space per passenger than a car and still fit way more people in one than in the equivalent amount of car. There will never be a way to make cars as economical as trains, for very very very basic geometric reasons.
- Veedrac 2y ago> The LVCC so far is more expensive, slower to build [than subway] This is just factually false. LVCC was something like 4x cheaper than its competing non-subway bid and something like 20-30x cheaper than just the amortized cost per mile of subway in the US. Subway also ages to construct in the US.
- tsimionescu 2y agoIf you're comparing just to the US, maybe. It's still much more expensive to operate, per passenger.
- Veedrac 2y agoCompare it to Europe, same deal, the large constants are just slightly less large.