4 ms·
it's more like philosophy is the dumping ground for stuff that we don't understand well enough to formalize and place in its own little box. that means that it
by andrewcooke 14y ago
it's more like philosophy is the dumping ground for stuff that we don't understand well enough to formalize and place in its own little box. that means that it changes with time.
so there was a point when foundational issues in maths and logic were philosophy. the importance of frege, and then later peano, russel, etc, is that they were the ones that found a way to attack that set of problems, letting us isolate a chunk of knowledge as logic, set theory, etc.
a similar process is probably happening now with consciousness - we're starting to develop the tools to answer questions that are currently "philosophical".
- yxhuvud 14y agoYou can go back even further. The impact of Descartes and Leibniz on math is not small.
- bitdiddle 14y agoabsolutely, it's at the boundary. I think Brouwer's work in topology and intuitionistic logic is a good example of this interplay
- chrisdevereux 14y agoExactly. Claiming that Philosophy never answers anything makes one hell of a selection bias. When Philosophy answers something, it ceases to be Philosophy.