> I can completely understand why someone might focus on that as the most relevant definition on 'conservatism' today in the USA. You don't consider this a pro

> I can completely understand why someone might focus on that as the most relevant definition on 'conservatism' today in the USA. You don't consider this a problem, that the word "conservatism" when discussed with an unknown recipient online (very possibly non-american) is constrained to the context of the past decade(s) in the United States? Words have meaning, so if you're going to have a meaningful discussion about a word like "conservatism" or any type of -ism for that matter, I would think it benefits anyone engaging in that discussion to be aware of the different wings present in that word, whether that be across history or across present day geography.