3 ms·
Online comments / older articles also mention that New Brunswick is basically owned by the Irving family, which has lots of money and deep industrial connection
by calf 2y ago
Online comments / older articles also mention that New Brunswick is basically owned by the Irving family, which has lots of money and deep industrial connections, and unsurprisingly there is strong skepticism that they would be the ones who caused the sudden pivot from Federal to provincial and ensuing coverup.
It's a glaring omission either way that the NYTimes doesn't mention this at all...
- Rastonbury 2y agoIn a piece like this, a decent journalist would not mention speculation like that without more concrete proof which I assume they do not have or did not look into
- calf 2y agoAssuming it is true that NB politics is elite-captured by wealthy interests it is an omission of investigative journalism to at least raise the issue. The Irvings are likely "talk of the town" regarding this controversy, it would actually be the decent thing to voice the complaints of the locals. "Many locals have pointed finger at X corporation, and made the accusation Y" is also still journalistic documentation, if you want a paper of record. Journalism isn't narrowly about facts like in science, it is also about people and the complaints different groups have about each other, so it is not speculation to elucidate those conflicts and power dynamics by merely recording that they exist. An in depth article should have addressed this, somehow even if it were to conclude for the moment there is no substance to the locals' complaints about the Irving family. The Elephant in the Room is not to be dismissed as mere speculation.