Not saying glyphosate isn't the problem, but 15,000 times the lowest detectable amount doesn't really say how high it is. Maybe the test is really sensitive? M

Not saying glyphosate isn't the problem, but 15,000 times the lowest detectable amount doesn't really say how high it is. Maybe the test is really sensitive? Maybe farmers in non-cluster areas also have similar levels? What about the average? The highest was 15k times the minimum detectable, were the rest 5 on a scale of 100k? Were the rest higher than random people from elsewhere in the world? Seems to be reporter bias in that bit of the article.